The U.S. Federal Reserve, once the primary driver of markets, has taken a back seat this year to government actions and politics. So far, it’s been a bumpy ride.

An avalanche of changes coming out of Washington, D.C., around tariffs, federal layoffs and immigration has raised questions about the trajectory of inflation and growth, sending the U.S. stock market into a correction and clouding the Fed’s outlook. Market discussions have shifted away from optimism about a soft landing to worries about declining growth and stagflation. Against this backdrop, the Fed kept its finger firmly on the pause button at Wednesday’s policy meeting as it adopted a wait-and-see approach. Investors are now left wondering about the Fed’s next move.

In my view, rate cuts remain the most likely outcome this year, though I see a patient Fed taking its time before pulling the trigger. Rate reductions are also on the market’s radar; futures markets indicate that the likelihood of a rate cut in 2025 reached about 66% after the March 19 meeting, compared with about 50% in mid-February. Meanwhile, the likelihood of a rate hike this year has fallen into single-digit territory. Separately, the market is pricing in between two to three 25 basis point cuts in 2025, compared with the two projected by the Fed.

Despite the volatility, fixed income remains attractive given my views on the potential range of outcomes. While it may be tempting to limit duration given heightened uncertainty, investors should consider increasing duration due to the possibility of deeper Fed rate cuts than anticipated either due to inflation remaining contained or the economy faltering. Investors with low duration, credit-heavy portfolios may find themselves exposed during an equity market selloff.

In considering the wide range of potential outcomes and looking at market valuations across rates and credit, I am taking a balanced approach to portfolio construction. That includes yield curve positioning that may offer some protection to portfolios in multiple scenarios, including an equity market slump, alongside a diversified approach to credit sectors.

Here’s how I’m thinking about the probabilities behind the three scenarios and considerations for portfolio positioning:

Scenario 1: The Fed maintains its rate freeze

The Fed hit pause on rate cuts in January, holding the federal funds target rate in a range of 4.25% to 4.50%, and ending a streak of three meetings where rates fell by a full percentage point.

In the short term, we on the U.S. rates team think the Fed will stay on hold. Following the 2024 cuts, we are now closer to the neutral rate (where the Fed is trying neither to stimulate or restrict the economy). We believe the Fed is in a relatively good spot in terms of its dual mandate, with inflation generally trending toward its 2% target and a slowing yet seemingly resilient labor market. Still, the Consumer Price Index (CPI), which stood at 2.8% in February, as well as the core Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) Index, which was 2.6% in January, remain elevated.

The Fed has indicated that it’s seeking clarity on the path of Trump administration policies before it moves. In particular, monetary policymakers will need to better understand the impacts on inflation and employment — the components of its dual mandate to promote maximum employment and price stability.

"Uncertainty around the changes and their effects on the economic outlook is high. As we parse the incoming information, we are focused on separating the signal from the noise as the outlook evolves,” said Fed Chair Jerome Powell in a March 19 press conference. “We do not need to be to be in a hurry to adjust our policy stance, and we are well positioned to wait for clarity.”

Details on tariffs, including the magnitude and duration as well as any retaliatory actions potentially leading to an all-out trade war, remain a major uncertainty. Impacts from changes to immigration policy, tax cuts and deregulation are also significant sources of unpredictability. Some of these individual changes can have diametric impacts on inflation and growth, making the overall impulse for interest rate policy unclear. Amid this uncertainty, we believe Fed officials may be less willing to make significant moves.

Should the Fed hold rates steady, we anticipate bonds will continue to provide attractive income opportunities given historically elevated starting yields. In this scenario, we expect U.S. Treasuries to remain range bound, with 10-year yields in the range of 4% to 5%. Investors who already boosted their fixed income allocations as cuts began may see opportunities to add more interest rate exposure if yields drift into the upper end of that range.

Scenario 2: The Fed resumes rate cuts

As the Fed parses data on inflation, I see encouraging signs that additional rate reductions may be on the table later this year.

Broad-based inflationary pressures, which defined price movements in 2021 and 2022 while spurring aggressive rate hikes, appear to have eased back to pre-pandemic levels. Looking at the distribution of inflationary trends within the CPI basket, about 50% of the basket is at or below the Fed’s 2% target in terms of its annualized rate of inflation. That includes a number of components where prices are outright falling. In addition, the downward price trend in shelter — the largest component of CPI — may continue to filter through and push the headline stat lower.

If economic conditions deteriorate to the point where they start threatening labor markets, we’d anticipate deeper rate cuts. While unemployment remained in its historically low range at 4.1% in February, there are potential risks to growth from tariffs and federal government layoffs. We’re also closely watching consumer sentiment for signs that the specter of reinflation and ongoing market volatility are having a negative impact.

I think the Fed could have enough clarity on economic data and fiscal policy to potentially lower rates in the second half of the year, assuming the economy doesn’t weaken and push the Fed to cut even sooner. Falling rates could lead to price appreciation for bonds, especially those with longer durations as they are more sensitive to changes in interest rates. Bonds may also be expected to help diversify portfolios as stock-bond correlations have begun to normalize.

Scenario 3: The Fed makes a U-turn and hikes rates

A return to rate hikes, while not an outcome I anticipate, cannot be dismissed. Under certain economic conditions, the Fed may be inclined to tighten monetary policy.

In one possible outcome, the Trump administration could implement deep and sustained tariffs, leading to a broadening of inflationary pressures. However, the stagflation and lower growth environment that typically accompanies tariffs could complicate the Fed’s response.

On the other hand, an overheated economy, potentially fueled by capital expenditures, tax cuts and deregulation, could prompt the Fed to curb growth if consumer prices move meaningfully higher. That said, I believe the threshold of clear indicators needed for the Fed to hike rates is much higher than the threshold to lower rates.

In a rate hiking environment, I anticipate that yields would rise, particularly on the short end of the curve.

Amid uncertainty, balance may be best

When viewing the mosaic of rate path probabilities and the magnitude of rate moves, I land in a spot where I see value in relatively high starting yields and moderate duration exposure — with tactical opportunities to increase duration further. Bonds appear well-positioned to provide potentially attractive income and ballast in investor portfolios as markets could remain volatile in the weeks and months ahead.

Read important disclosures