Market volatility

4 scenarios for uncertain markets

There are no facts about the future — this much is certain.

 

But when policy uncertainty reaches extreme levels, it can send markets tumbling and weigh on business as well as consumer and investor confidence.

 

Since the Trump administration unveiled sweeping tariffs on April 2, financial markets have swung wildly from steep declines to robust gains, often turning on the latest news headlines. As of April 24, the S&P 500 Index declined 8.9% year to date. What’s more, U.S. GDP contracted 0.3% in the first quarter, the largest drop since 2022, according to the U.S. Commerce Department.

Trade uncertainty may continue to drive markets

Sources: Capital Group, Standard & Poor’s, Bloomberg Index Services Ltd. Percent change for the S&P 500 Index reflects total returns. As of April 10, 2025. Past results are not predictive of results in future periods.

The tariffs represent the latest development in a fundamental shift away from the rules-based international order in place since the end of World War II. “This erosion of the old geopolitical order didn’t just start with the current administration. It’s been going on since at least the global financial crisis from 2007 to 2009,” says international policy advisor Tom Cooney.

 

What’s new is that the U.S., the leading defender of global free trade, is now seeking to reframe it. “The administration wants to achieve a fundamental restructuring of the system that it perceives as more advantageous to America and working middle-class Americans,” Cooney says. “That’s a lofty and admirable goaI, but there are serious risks.”

 

In the near term, attempts to fundamentally restructure global trade, or even an extended period of uncertainty, could slow growth, boost inflation and raise the risk of a recession. Longer term, protracted uncertainty could negatively affect the reputation of the U.S. as a reliable trade partner and security ally. On the other hand, markets could respond positively to announcements of swift and successful trade negotiations that rapidly lead to a new normal.

 

The wide range of potential policy outcomes presents unprecedented challenges for investors.

Geopolitics and investing under Trump 2.0

Thursday, May 22 | 11 AM PT/2 PM ET

CE credit available

Night Watch sheds daylight on uncertainty

So what comes next for the global economy and markets? “When uncertainty reaches extreme levels, single-point forecasts can fall short in helping portfolio managers make good investment decisions,” says investment director Jayme Colosimo.

 

Enter the Night Watch, a team of Capital Group economists, political analysts and portfolio managers that explores market disruptions to help make better investment decisions.

 

Named after a painting by 17th century Dutch master Rembrandt, the Night Watch uses scenario analysis as a framework to explore a range of outcomes rather than try to predict a specific result. “The goal is to gather a range of perspectives from across Capital to provide a dynamic forum for forward-looking scenarios, and ultimately connect these scenarios to investment implications," adds Colosimo.

 

“We don’t make predictions,” says U.S. economist Jared Franz, who chairs the Night Watch. “We try to identify a set of narratives that all plausibly construct a view of the future. We then connect investment implications to each outcome, so portfolio managers are prepared to make investment decisions as the future unfolds.”

 

The Night Watch has evaluated major crises including the COVID pandemic, global military conflicts and debt crises, among others. “The team looks to consider issues in advance or before they escalate and identify in advance potential low probability or tail events that could have high impact,” Colosimo says.

A framework for an uncertain future

This year, the group has taken on the Trump administration’s imposition of historic tariffs and shake-up of traditional security alliances. The groundwork for this analysis was launched shortly after President Trump’s election in November 2024.

Geopolitical realignment: Potential outcomes and investment implications

Source: Capital Group. Scenarios reflect analysis of Capital Group’s Night Watch team as of April 2025, and are not predictive of future outcomes.

The team has identified four broad potential outcomes: trade battlefront, grand trade bargains, return of global powers and assertive nationalism.

 

In the grand bargain scenario, traditional alliances are restored, possibly with some adjustments. Geopolitical conflicts are diminished, and political leaders strike broad trade deals. “This is the most benign scenario and generally a good environment for equity markets and the economy,” Franz says.

 

Isolationism, the inverse of that benign scenario, is characterized by a global trade war and increased use of hard power to address security concerns, with a tail risk potential for military clashes between major powers. “This is the worst-case scenario that combines trade wars with potential shooting wars,” Franz says.

 

The return of great powers would feature a mix of nonaggression pacts among the major powers, which would each dominate a regional bloc. “Think of this as going back to the age of empires, where the U.S., China and Russia each have individual spheres of influence,” Franz adds.

Where are we today — and where are we headed?

The Night Watch team’s view is that the world has left the old order behind and recently entered the trade battlefront scenario, characterized by significant tariffs, technology export restrictions, and other protectionist measures that would accelerate economic decoupling and supply chain shifting. “This is the scenario of tough trade wars but not shooting wars,” Cooney explains. “Great powers like the U.S. and China clash in terms of technology and trade but have no wish for a military confrontation.”

 

If the world remains in a protracted trade struggle, economic growth will likely be more subdued going forward, and inflation could rise, Franz says. “If these tariffs are around long term, we are likely to see slower growth beyond 2025. On the other hand, if trade deals are struck relatively quickly, then a transition to the grand bargain scenario becomes more likely.”

 

How long will it take for a clear picture of the new global order to take shape? Given the complexity of trade negotiations and the vast number of trading partners, investors should not expect a speedy resolution, Cooney explains. “The world is in a transition state. It took years to build the post-war order, and it could be several years before a new geopolitical order stabilizes.”

 

“The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) does not have the capacity to iron out detailed agreements with some 90 countries during the 90-day pause that ends in July,” Cooney says, adding that the USTR, with a relatively small staff, has limited bandwidth to tackle many complex deals quickly. “This could be a multiyear process, especially among our largest and most complex trading relationships with economies like China and Europe.”

 

To calm markets, the Trump administration will want to announce a series of deals as swiftly as possible. These could be mini deals, which fall short of a full free trade agreement. During the first Trump administration, mini deals were reached with Japan, China and Brazil. It also could extend the 90-day tariff pause, though uncertainty would remain elevated, and that could cause ongoing market volatility if each extension is accompanied by political brinksmanship.

 

“I do expect that the administration will look for some early deals with Japan and Korea, which would be easier to achieve,” Cooney says. “But renegotiating the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement is complicated, and formal negotiations haven’t started yet, so that will take some time. Similarly, negotiations with the EU will take quite a bit longer. And the U.S.-China trade relationship, the core of this conflict, could take years and again only result in a partial trade conflict ‘ceasefire.’ Currently, there is no substantive government-to-government dialogue underway between China and the U.S.”

 

Lengthy negotiations could further weigh on markets and the economy. “The lack of certainty is one of the biggest problems here,” Cooney explains. “Companies will be reluctant to make long-term capital spending commitments without a firmer sense of the rules going forward.” Corporate spending could be depressed for an extended period.

 

Even after deals are struck, there is some risk that U.S. credibility as a partner and linchpin of global trade and security could be diminished over the longer term, as could the world’s view of the dollar as a reserve currency and the perceived safety of U.S. government debt, Cooney says.

Investment implications

For investors, the key to navigating this uncertainty is to stay humble about what's knowable, not get anchored to a particular world view, and to be prepared for the unexpected, believes Jody Jonsson, Vice Chair of Capital Group and an equity portfolio manager for New Perspective Fund®.

 

Jonsson seeks to strike a balance between defensive and offensive investments in her portfolio. “If there's any favorable resolution, the markets could shoot upwards, as we saw when the announcement of a 90-day pause on tariffs April 9 set off a strong market rally,” Jonsson says. “This is an important time to pay close attention to valuations and dividend income, a time when boring is beautiful.”

 

For example, insurance companies like Chubb do not export or import any goods, so their business wouldn’t be meaningfully impacted by tariffs. Elsewhere in financials, CME Group, which operates derivatives exchanges, has seen higher trading volumes when markets have been volatile.

 

“I also believe all of this strengthens the case for a globally diversified portfolio. It is tough to know when or where trade negotiations will succeed,” Jonsson explains.

 

Lastly, once trade negotiations begin to result in agreements, investors and companies will have some clarity, and the investing picture may brighten. “I do think that we're probably at a point of maximum uncertainty right now,” Jonsson adds, “but eventually things will look less bad.”

TSEC_IMG_E2278_2023_crop

Tom Cooney is an international policy advisor with 31 years of foreign affairs experience (as of 12/31/2024). He holds a master's degree in international business studies from the University of South Carolina and a bachelor's degree in communications from Cornell University.

JASF

Jared Franz is an economist with 19 years of investment industry experience (as of 12/31/2024). He holds a PhD in economics from the University of Illinois at Chicago and a bachelor’s degree in mathematics from Northwestern University.

jayme-colosimo-color-600x600

Jayme Colosimo is an investment director with 24 years of investment industry experience (as of 12/31/2024). She holds an MBA and a bachelor’s degree in international business from Westminster College.

jody-johnson-color-600x600new

Jody Jonsson is vice chair of Capital Group, president of Capital Research and Management Company and an equity portfolio manager. She has 38 years of investment industry experience (as of 12/31/2024). Jody holds an MBA from Stanford and a bachelor’s degree in economics from Princeton.

Investing outside the United States involves risks, such as currency fluctuations, periods of illiquidity and price volatility. These risks may be heightened in connection with investments in developing countries.

 

S&P 500 Index is a market capitalization-weighted index based on the results of approximately 500 widely held common stocks. The index is unmanaged and therefore has no expenses. Investors cannot invest directly in an index.

 

Bloomberg U.S. Economic Policy Uncertainty Index measures the level of uncertainty surrounding economic policy decisions in the United States and is calculated by counting the number of articles in newspapers that discuss economic policy uncertainty.

 

BLOOMBERG® is a trademark and service mark of Bloomberg Finance L.P. and its affiliates (collectively “Bloomberg”). Bloomberg or Bloomberg’s licensors own all proprietary rights in the Bloomberg Indices. Neither Bloomberg nor Bloomberg’s licensors approves or endorses this material, or guarantees the accuracy or completeness of any information herein, or makes any warranty, express or implied, as to the results to be obtained therefrom and, to the maximum extent allowed by law, neither shall have any liability or responsibility for injury or damages arising in connection therewith.

 

The S&P 500 Index is a product of S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC and/or its affiliates and has been licensed for use by Capital Group. Copyright © 2025 S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC, a division of S&P Global, and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Redistribution or reproduction in whole or in part is prohibited without written permission of S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC.

Investments are not FDIC-insured, nor are they deposits of or guaranteed by a bank or any other entity, so they may lose value.
Investors should carefully consider investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses. This and other important information is contained in the mutual fund prospectuses and summary prospectuses, which can be obtained from a financial professional and should be read carefully before investing.
Statements attributed to an individual represent the opinions of that individual as of the date published and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Capital Group or its affiliates. This information is intended to highlight issues and should not be considered advice, an endorsement or a recommendation.
All Capital Group trademarks mentioned are owned by The Capital Group Companies, Inc., an affiliated company or fund. All other company and product names mentioned are the property of their respective companies.
Use of this website is intended for U.S. residents only. Use of this website and materials is also subject to approval by your home office.
Capital Client Group, Inc.
This content, developed by Capital Group, home of American Funds, should not be used as a primary basis for investment decisions and is not intended to serve as impartial investment or fiduciary advice.